Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: Good Bokeh?
From: digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird)
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 14:20:30 -0500
References: <v2gdaaeb97e1004172312md9e6dc0fk6878be709094d38b@mail.gmail.com> <F49DA823-3821-4D24-98BD-218ED5F08B2A@mac.com>

George,

I see what you mean. I thought it was moderately good bokeh when I
first took it. But as you say it's all subjective. Oh well, I only
paid 49 bucks for it. Maybe I can get a Leica R 200 some day for that
price (in my dreams;)

Jim Laird

On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:53 AM, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com> 
wrote:
> obviously subjective
> but I find the bokeh
> quite disturbing
> reminds me of the glass
> used in some bathroom windows.
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
> On Apr 18, 2010, at 1:12 AM, James Laird wrote:
>
>> Trying out my 'new' Nikkor 200 f4 on my GH1 I took this:
>>
>>
>> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/digiratidoc/GH1/Nikkor-200f4-Bokeh.jpg.html>
>>
>> Now I think this is great bokeh. Agree?
>>
>> Jim Laird
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] OT: Good Bokeh?)
In reply to: Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] OT: Good Bokeh?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] OT: Good Bokeh?)