Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 3.5 cm. Elmar
From: lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 22:28:20 +0200
References: <00d601cad739$2b6382d0$822a8870$@net><l2w19b6d42d1004081229l56214eb2la0d44aba13e93d2f@mail.gmail.com><010d01cad77d$57229b10$0567d130$@net><55F1C43F-C146-4125-BE52-2D477346BB2C@usjet.net> <BF249C0300D748DCA9B4141513DE5D9E@jimnichols> <7E27773B9C054B028519D80A7ACFB23E@jimnichols>

It is an excellent lens:

http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/El_Raval/2010010201.jpg.html

this and the 5 following pics
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2010010204.jpg.html

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4484653

I don't know how is the Summaron, the Summitar, yes, it is excellent
http://photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=808600

Saludos
Lluis

http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/
http://photo.net/photos/lluisripoll
Blog:
http://lluisripollphotography.wordpress.com/



El 09/04/2010, a las 18:11, Jim Nichols escribi?:

> Here are my two Barnack rigs.
>
> Leica IIIf RD with Jupiter 12 35mm f/2.8 and CV finder:
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/J-12withCVFinder.JPG.html
>
> Leica IIIa with coated 50mm 3.5 Elmar and Leitz finder:
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/2006_0219LeicaIIIa0003small.JPG.html
>
> I bought this camera and lens in 1952.
>
> Both produce fine images, but film processing is now a real problem  
> in my area.
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Nichols" <jhnichols at 
> lighttube.net 
> >
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 11:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] 3.5 cm. Elmar
>
>
>> Bob,
>>
>> Haven't owned one, but did some research on them. Reportedly  
>> somewhat soft, by today's standards, and often found with haze.  I  
>> bought a Russian lens instead.
>>
>> Jim Nichols
>> Tullahoma, TN USA
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Meier" <robertmeier at 
>> usjet.net 
>> >
>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 11:14 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] 3.5 cm. Elmar
>>
>>
>>> Does anyone have any experience with the old 3.5 cm. Elmar, an  
>>> LTM  lens from the 30's and 40's?   Is it a decent lens, or not?
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] 3.5 cm. Elmar)
Reply from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] 3.5 cm. Elmar)
Reply from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] 3.5 cm. Elmar)
In reply to: Message from jshul at comcast.net (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] PESO: Flipping the Bird)
Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] PESO: Flipping the Bird)
Message from jshul at comcast.net (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] PESO: Flipping the Bird)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] 3.5 cm. Elmar)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] 3.5 cm. Elmar)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] 3.5 cm. Elmar)