Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Use Ilford XP2. If it doesn't look grainy enough Photoshop it. Sent from my iPhone On Apr 9, 2010, at 12:05 AM, Robert Meier <robertmeier at usjet.net> wrote: > I'm looking for that older look of pictures from the 30's and 40's. > The 3.5cm Elmar might be a good place to start. I wish I could get > some film that isn't a superfine grain modern emulsion. > > On Apr 8, 2010, at 11:37 PM, Chris Williams wrote: > >> I have an uncoated 50/3.5 from 1936(I think that's the date). I >> found it works quite well on my M8, just don't collapse it of >> course. I can't show any recent images since they are from bridal >> shoots and the wedding has not happened yet so I can't show the >> bride. Great lens for getting sun flare in portraits when you want >> something different. I do have to really bump up the contrast in LR >> though as an uncoated lens on digital is really flat looking. >> >> Chris >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Meier" >> Subject: Re: [Leica] 3.5 cm. Elmar >> >> >>> Does anyone have any experience with the old 3.5 cm. Elmar, an >>> LTM lens from the 30's and 40's? Is it a decent lens, or not? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information