Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] 3.5 cm. Elmar
From: mak at teleport.com (Mark Kronquist)
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 21:24:54 -0700
References: <00d601cad739$2b6382d0$822a8870$@net><l2w19b6d42d1004081229l56214eb2la0d44aba13e93d2f@mail.gmail.com><010d01cad77d$57229b10$0567d130$@net> <55F1C43F-C146-4125-BE52-2D477346BB2C@usjet.net> <BF249C0300D748DCA9B4141513DE5D9E@jimnichols>
 
I have owned several some hazy some not. A CV Lens is a better choice  
by far for the same price than the Elmar or Summaron
On Apr 8, 2010, at 9:22 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:

> Bob,
>
> Haven't owned one, but did some research on them. Reportedly  
> somewhat soft, by today's standards, and often found with haze.  I  
> bought a Russian lens instead.
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Meier" <robertmeier at 
> usjet.net 
> >
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 11:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] 3.5 cm. Elmar
>
>
>> Does anyone have any experience with the old 3.5 cm. Elmar, an LTM   
>> lens from the 30's and 40's?   Is it a decent lens, or not?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to: Message from jshul at comcast.net (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] PESO: Flipping the Bird)
Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] PESO: Flipping the Bird)
Message from jshul at comcast.net (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] PESO: Flipping the Bird)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] 3.5 cm. Elmar)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] 3.5 cm. Elmar)