Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I used to really malign this lens, that is until this year. I had one, and also the F4 LTM. I had a photo mural go up, 8.5x21 feet. There is a section in there, 4x6 feet, taken with a late 21 S/A. I have to admit, it translated information in the shadows areas better than anything else on the wall. Yes, I ate crow. S.d. On Mar 8, 2010, at 12:15 AM, Richard Man wrote: > The SA 21mm/3.4 seems to be a cult status lens that also is a good shooter, > and it seems to even meter OK on a digital M (someone says a 2 1/3 + > exposure works well on his M8). > > I suppose the the Elmarit ASPH is a better lens overall (although actually > I > would be looking at the Zeiss 21/2.8 alternative due to cost factor), but > if > you feel like singing praises for the SA21, please enlighten me, > > Thank you, > > -- > // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/> blog: < > http://imagecraft.wordpress.com> > // portfolio: > <http://www.dragonsgate.net/pub/richard/PICS/AnotherCalifornia >> > // mailing lists: <http://www.imagecraft.com/contact.html> > [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous > replies in your msgs. ] > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information