Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> I used to really malign this lens, that is until this year. I had one, and > also the F4 LTM. I had a photo mural go up, 8.5x21 feet. There is a > section in > there, 4x6 feet, taken with a late 21 S/A. I have to admit, it translated > information in the shadows areas better than anything else on the wall. > Yes, I > ate crow. > S.d. > For me the 21mm Super-Angulon-M ?3.4 will always be a main reason for shooting Leica M. For many people the only reason. A dream lens. A true wide angle lens. Not retrofocus. A minute foot print. Its tiny. Love it. Super corrected at the edges for architected work like a retrofocal design only dreams to be. And I don't care about some drop off of light at the perimeters. Can it be compared to the exquisite monster the 21 ASPH? A retrofocal lens? One needs both. [Rabs] Mark William Rabiner