Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I don't agree with the decision. I am just saying *why* such decision may have been made. I think the award process should allow a brief explanation of minor edit to be submitted and the decision should be made in a case by case basis. More work of course for the sponsor, but if they say something like "limited editing for editorial purposes," may be it will limit such submissions. On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Richard Man <richard at imagecraft.com> > wrote: > > > Just playing Devil's Advocate here: I guess there is certain purity in > what > > the photographer sees as his immediate reactions, and using his > equipments > > he has on hand right then and there. Any post editing afterward becomes > > editorially changed. > > > > So it is OK if the Picture editor does it, but not OK if the Photog edits > it? > > > > Regards, > > Sonny > http://www.sonc.com > http://sonc.stumbleupon.com/ > Natchitoches, Louisiana > (+31.754164,-093.099080) > > USA > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/> blog: < http://imagecraft.wordpress.com> // portfolio: <http://www.dragonsgate.net/pub/richard/PICS/AnotherCalifornia > // mailing lists: <http://www.imagecraft.com/contact.html> [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous replies in your msgs. ]