Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] PIXEL PITCH SIZE
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 20:47:14 -0600
References: <C7B1A26B.5E7F5%mark@rabinergroup.com><34406732-B9DA-4D3E-8731-669CAE4FF3AE@mac.com><36172e5a1003011729s36475d89h10363f612022dc19@mail.gmail.com> <B22603AF-4C8E-4351-8633-BC8301AFB528@mac.com>

Same size pixels as my 5mpixel CCD Olympus E-1, which gave me one of the 
best photos that I ever made. :-)

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "George Lottermoser" <imagist3 at mac.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] PIXEL PITCH SIZE


> I'm not at all surprised that the quality high,
> as these sized pixel CCDs
> have been delivering high quality images
> across most formats from x1 through 39mpixel and above.
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
> On Mar 1, 2010, at 7:29 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:
>
>> Not meant to be in any way scientific, but I was very impressed  with the
>> output from the X1 when I got to try it briefly. See here plus a  similar
>> frame from the S2.
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/hoppyman/2/JX1.jpg.html
>>
>> Cheers
>> Geoff
>> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
>>
>>
>> On 2 March 2010 10:32, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 1, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>>>
>>> A reason why the X1 is a big deal.
>>>> Same size or smaller camera. Twice the a acreage.  Or darned  close to 
>>>> it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> However a CCD with a pixel size of only 6.8 (same size as M8 and 9)
>>>
>>> A reason why the S2 is a big deal.
>>>> Same size or smaller camera. Twice the a acreage. Or darned close  to 
>>>> it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> However a CCD with a pixel size of only 6.0 (smaller than above)
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> George Lottermoser
>>> george at imagist.com
>>> http://www.imagist.com
>>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> 




Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] PIXEL PITCH SIZE)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] PIXEL PITCH SIZE)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] PIXEL PITCH SIZE)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] PIXEL PITCH SIZE)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] PIXEL PITCH SIZE)