Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'm not at all surprised that the quality high, as these sized pixel CCDs have been delivering high quality images across most formats from x1 through 39mpixel and above. Regards, George Lottermoser george at imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On Mar 1, 2010, at 7:29 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote: > Not meant to be in any way scientific, but I was very impressed > with the > output from the X1 when I got to try it briefly. See here plus a > similar > frame from the S2. > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/hoppyman/2/JX1.jpg.html > > Cheers > Geoff > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman > > > On 2 March 2010 10:32, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com> wrote: > >> On Mar 1, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote: >> >> A reason why the X1 is a big deal. >>> Same size or smaller camera. Twice the a acreage. Or darned >>> close to it. >>> >> >> However a CCD with a pixel size of only 6.8 (same size as M8 and 9) >> >> A reason why the S2 is a big deal. >>> Same size or smaller camera. Twice the a acreage. Or darned close >>> to it. >>> >> >> However a CCD with a pixel size of only 6.0 (smaller than above) >> >> >> Regards, >> George Lottermoser >> george at imagist.com >> http://www.imagist.com >> http://www.imagist.com/blog >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information