Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/02/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I sense that we are on the endangered species list. I use digital when I need the results today. But walking around in a lawless town with a $6,000 camera/lens in my hand gives me reason to pause. Jeffery On Feb 28, 2010, at 12:21 PM, Greg Lorenzo wrote: > > Jeff Smith wrote: > >> I find it interesting that people would get pelted with tomatoes for >> mentioning the word "digital" on this forum ten years ago. > >> Now that Leica has a nice albeit obscenely expensive digital camera, the >> word film might as well be the word phlegm. The few > >> people I know in town who still shoot with film have only one thing in >> common: Holga. >> > > > Jeffery, > > > > My recollection is it wasn't so much the mention of "digital" that > resulted in the on-list tomato shower in days gone by but rather how it > was mentioned by some. > > > I'm still using film and digital. I still prefer film for b&w but I no > longer have my darkroom setup and b&w film processing is quite problematic > in Calgary currently. > > > > Greg Lorenzo > > Calgary, Canada > > _________________________________________________________________ > Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. > http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469227/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information