Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/02/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I find it interesting that people would get pelted with tomatoes for mentioning the word "digital" on this forum ten years ago. Now that Leica has a nice albeit obscenely expensive digital camera, the word film might as well be the word phlegm. The few people I know in town who still shoot with film have only one thing in common: Holga. Jeffery On Feb 28, 2010, at 1:06 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote: >> Isn't it wonderful how we can get so passionate about exactly what focuses >> light the way we want, and how much we are willing to spend for that >> quality >> of refraction? >> The guy who can take a wonderful photo with a crap lens, now, THAT'S worth >> talking about! He/she could certainly do it with a mediocre lens as well. >> I >> really feel like my 50/3.5 Elmar collapsible is the crappiest "good" lens >> in >> my arsenal, and some photographers have gotten really great images with >> it. I >> love Capa's stuff taken with a [choke!] Zeiss lens. Where the hell are my >> priorities? >> Let's go for 100 posts! My prediction is that this thread may >> self-destruct or >> be tweeted off the forum by Brian. >> >> Jeffery > > > I do find it wonderfully interesting how I can get pelted with tomatoes for > defending Leica products on the Leica User's Group list. How dare I think > a > Leica lens is not on par with a third party lens costing a third as > much!?!?! That's heresy! > > [Rabs] > Mark William Rabiner > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information