Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/02/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] EYE BLINK TIME?
From: hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson)
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 07:32:18 +1000
References: <23502690.1264904017335.JavaMail.root@wamui-junio.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <B3109AE1-1427-422F-A6D4-D1A56438DE74@gmail.com> <20100201142217.GB30022@ssx-book.125px.com> <DAF6F897-735D-4101-873E-40949532832E@gmail.com> <03AFB919-7600-4ED7-AA14-B8FFF5E5370C@btinternet.com> <70D8CAA7-5A9F-4D19-A17D-55ED1EE21CB4@gmail.com> <54E73BF2-6653-4C6E-A048-8AF708A2CC4A@embarqmail.com>

Ric I think it has evolved because people will test every possible option to
gain a tiny advantage, especially where the difference between winning and
second place can be measured in hundredths of a second.
Think about it. EVERYONE wants to anticipate the gun as well as possible and
be moving the first possible legal instant after the bang. There has to be a
line somewhere. As far as I know, the .10 second is set to be below any
known recorded human response. You can't rewire your electrical impulses to
move your body that fast! it is just physically impossible.
Everyone anticipates and its a level playing field. Especially with
sprinters at this level, very likely they all have superb reflexes and
reaction times to go with those explosive fast twitch fibres all wired with
adrenalin. ANYTHING for an edge. Ask a certain Canadian sprinter Ted knows
well. Another athlete false starting also causes a restart which can
disadvantage everyone too. Similar system happens in swimming of course. Now
the 10,000 and the marathon tend to make such things irrelevant!'
 Cheers
Geoff (very ex-marathoner)
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman


On 2 February 2010 02:57, Ric Carter <ricc at embarqmail.com> wrote:

> the more i think about this, the more asinine it is.
>
> suppose an athlete (as is likely) has quicker reaction times than average
> or thought possible?
>
> It not far from denying Usain Bolt a gold medal because he ran the 100
> meters faster than was possible for a human being.
>
> ric
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 1, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Steve Barbour wrote:
>
> >
> > On Feb 1, 2010, at 8:34 AM, Frank Dernie wrote:
> >
> >> IIRC yes, in the Olympic Games there is a time after the gun goes off
> which is considered to be less than human reaction time, so if anybody goes
> during this period it is considered a false start.
> >>
> >> !!!
> >
> > amazing, documentaion of this fact/rule available?
> >
> >
> > Steve
> >
> >
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] EYE BLINK TIME?)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] EYE BLINK TIME?)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] EYE BLINK TIME?)
Message from tgray at 125px.com (Tim Gray) ([Leica] EYE BLINK TIME?)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] EYE BLINK TIME?)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] EYE BLINK TIME?)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] EYE BLINK TIME?)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] EYE BLINK TIME?)