Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Happy you're not going to quarrel about this E3 vs M8 guys. From what I saw in Nathan's week, the M8 looks superior to the GF1. Unless the same care has not been applied to both when editing ? which I doubt as Nathan is very serious about his photography. And you know I like Lumixes. So the good news is that rumours (too) slowly confirm a new generation of micro and standard 4/3 from Pana and Oly. Keep watching Amiti?s to both of you Philippe Le 22 janv. 10 ? 22:21, Richard Man a ?crit : > > You may have a bum E-3 :-) Anyway, really, lets not get to THAT again, > I think some Aussie is still mad at me :-) > > For my own pictures, my E-3 pics hold up quite well to my M8 pics. I > have tons of Taiko and wedding shots that blow up to 16x20 quite > nicely. YMMV. > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Nathan Wajsman > <photo at frozenlight.eu> wrote: >> Richard, I am certainly no uncritical Leica fan boy, and I have the >> E3 too and have shot lots of pictures with it...but since I got the >> M8 a year ago, the E3 has been relegated to backup duty. And every >> time I use it, such as during my 1 month while the M8 was in Solms >> over Christmas, I look at the images in LR and I realize that there >> simply is no comparison. >> >> The GF-1 in good light can hold its own against the M8. The E3 >> cannot. >> > > > > -- > // richard m: richard @imagecraft.com > // w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog: > http://rfman.wordpress.com > // book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963 > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >