Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks for the reply Mehrdad. Is AF accurate with the converted CZ lenses ? How speedy is it compared to native Canon lenses? Also, is any compensation required for exposure, or can you just go by the meter? Regards, Akhil On Mon, 21 Dec 2009, mehrdad wrote: > Akhil on a regular basis, i converted the 24-85,100 macro 17-35 and the > 70-300. i used the 24-85 and 17-35 the most out of this set. the 24-85 is > almost permanently attached to a kodak slr/c. i have also used them with > canon FF > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Akhil Lal <alal at poly.edu> wrote: > >> Hello Everyone, >> >> I am looking for user reports on Contax N mount lenses converted by >> Conurus >> to fit the EOS mount. Has anyone here has used one of these converted >> lenses >> on a full frame Canon EOS body? If so, how well did the converted lens >> work >> and were the AF and exposure accurate? >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> Akhil >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > > -- > ------------------------------------- > regards, mehrdad > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >