Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Contax N lens question
From: msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad)
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:48:14 -0800
References: <14006.76148.qm@web82104.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <342400.37424.qm@web82103.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <CD46A05FDA8A43CDB7D7EC258B0A2A3D@jimnichols> <953746.80119.qm@web82107.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <6DD526FC-A563-41F4-90CC-4748218B405F@embarqmail.com> <Pine.GSO.4.62.0912202101320.15929@duke.poly.edu>

Akhil on a regular basis, i converted the 24-85,100 macro 17-35 and the
70-300. i used the 24-85 and 17-35 the most out of this set. the 24-85 is
almost permanently attached to a kodak slr/c. i have also used them with
canon FF

On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Akhil Lal <alal at poly.edu> wrote:

> Hello Everyone,
>
> I am looking for user reports on Contax N mount lenses converted by Conurus
> to fit the EOS mount. Has anyone here has used one of these converted 
> lenses
> on a full frame Canon EOS body? If so, how well did the converted lens work
> and were the AF and exposure accurate?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Akhil
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
 -------------------------------------
 regards, mehrdad


Replies: Reply from alal at poly.edu (Akhil Lal) ([Leica] Contax N lens question)
In reply to: Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] First Blog Attempt)
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] First Blog Attempt)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] First Blog Attempt)
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] First Blog Attempt)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] First Blog Attempt)
Message from alal at poly.edu (Akhil Lal) ([Leica] Contax N lens question)