Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/12/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] A tad noncommittal X1 review
From: Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie)
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 07:46:20 +0000
References: <3834B403E32A4C6D90D922F435CD5645@Family><200912191648.CCS16676@rg5.comporium.net> <BCC0FD11-29DA-4DB3-A50D-9A4E6407C64E@gmail.com> <C15FCA56AE0B4EC2BB6E613A8B933EA8@Family> <014f01ca80f1$2736fff0$75a4ffd0$@net>
????????????
On 19 Dec, 2009, at 21:20, Frank Filippone wrote:
> The X1 has no AF
Replies:
Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] A tad noncommittal X1 review)
In reply to:
Message from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] A tad noncommittal X1 review)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] A tad noncommittal X1 review)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] A tad noncommittal X1 review)
Message from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] A tad noncommittal X1 review)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] A tad noncommittal X1 review)