Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/11/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses" JPEG &RAW????
From: tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca)
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:01:22 -0800
References: <83E99E8D-A0BF-4C04-81E3-2780799D87EE@gmail.com> <C71E856F.584BF%mark@rabinergroup.com> <00f201ca6210$9ee00240$dca006c0$@net> <16094F5A-9F8F-4AF0-98DB-EC96D849D31B@gmail.com> <8DD2D9BC569441A3B1D94E6BD93C6784@syneticfeba505> <BFD7A713DD4D4BB29AD2EC3ECF31D6D5@LENOVO73EC0E2F> <9962CCDEC6AE434B955619259201C8CB@syneticfeba505> <7ac27f4f0911111741s5147c797ga65be6a135813cf1@mail.gmail.com>
 
Hi Richard,
Thank you as I've had a few answers and know why some folks shoot in that 
fashion. And my computer is far from slow as it down loads stuff like it's 
coming off a luanching pad at Mach22! :-)

Thanks for your note.
cheers,
ted


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Man" <richard.lists at gmail.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses" JPEG 
&RAW????


> Dr. Ted, IF your computer is slow, then you may want to shoot RAW+JPG
> so you can see the JPG as soon as you download to your computer.
>
> However, that shouldn't be a problem with any computer made in the
> last, say, 3 years, and if you are shooting a "mere" 10-12 MP camera
> like M8 etc, I'd imagine that even with the 25 MP files from the
> full-framers that LR and other Raw converters can display a JPG rather
> quickly on any of the newer machines.
>
> Or if you are a "bit-head," you can compare the difference between the
> camera produced JPG vs. the PC/Mac Raw converter's output and select
> the ones you like better. That's probably just a waste of time though,
> although, I am 100% sure there there millions of threads on the
> Internet praising the value of doing such a thing.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:39 AM,  <tedgrant at shaw.ca> wrote:
>>
>> I have a question back, why in all "common sense," never mind wishy washy 
>> reasons, would one shoot RAW & JPEG at the same time?" I see that as a 
>> complete waste of card space and battery waste. Not to forget it's double 
>> the editing time later? Anyone?
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> // richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
> // w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog:
> http://rfman.wordpress.com
> // book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.425 / Virus Database: 270.14.61/2497 - Release Date: 11/11/09 
19:41:00
In reply to: Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")
Message from jimlong5 at charter.net (Jim) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses" JPEG & RAW????)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses" JPEG & RAW????)