Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]1. Make it 77mm high (M3 height) 2. Give it a 1-inch counterclockwise shutter dial 3. Make available .85 or .92 magnification VF 4. (smile) -rei Nathan Wajsman wrote: > I can think of at least the following that would be included in a > future M10: > > - better high ISO performance (whether or not at the cost of reducing > pixel count must depend on the state of sensor technology in a couple > of years) > - a flip-out LCD with Live View > - video capability > - geo tagging and other snazzy features found on modern cameras > - wifi or bluetooth or 3G/4G capability > > Not all of these are important to me personally (the first two are), > but I can imagine that they are for the market. > > Nathan > > Nathan Wajsman > Alicante, Spain > http://www.frozenlight.eu > http://www.greatpix.eu > http://www.nathanfoto.com > > Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog > > > > On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:22 PM, Frank Dernie wrote: > >> For me the Leica M9 is spot on. They could have made it just for me :-) >> I, for one would not trade less resolution for higher iso, though of >> course higher iso would not be a retrograde step... >> Frank >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information