Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Jerry, The sensor is as large as it can be given the size of the body, and the body will not be smaller due to electronics and packaging issues, mainly the LCD requires a thicker body, and height will also be the same for the same reason of the LCD. Live view does not interest me, due to excellent viewfinder already in place. Gene -------------- Original message from Jerry Justianto <jsjgroups at gmail.com>: -------------- > My wish list: > > 1. Nikon or Canon Sensor > 2. Wider and better ISO 50-6400, considering most of us have summiluxes. > 3. Live-View > 4. Bigger LCD > 5. Sensor cleaner mechanism. > 6. Smaller body just like MP > > JSJ > > > On 10/27/09, Douglas Sharp wrote: > > And a price reduction of about 1000 euros :-) > > Douglas > > > > Lluis Ripoll Querol wrote: > >> Nathan, as you say these are mostly importanty for the market that > >> than for me. > >> > >> ISO performence is always welcome but not a really need for me, I > >> prefer other facilities as: > >> > >> - Viewfinder at least 0,72x > >> - Sensor auto cleaning > >> - Block the selector, it is too easy to move it > >> > >> Saludos, > >> Lluis > >> > >> > >> El 26/10/2009, a las 18:58, Nathan Wajsman escribi?: > >> > >>> I can think of at least the following that would be included in a > >>> future M10: > >>> > >>> - better high ISO performance (whether or not at the cost of reducing > >>> pixel count must depend on the state of sensor technology in a couple > >>> of years) > >>> - a flip-out LCD with Live View > >>> - video capability > >>> - geo tagging and other snazzy features found on modern cameras > >>> - wifi or bluetooth or 3G/4G capability > >>> > >>> Not all of these are important to me personally (the first two are), > >>> but I can imagine that they are for the market. > >>> > >>> Nathan > >>> > >>> Nathan Wajsman > >>> Alicante, Spain > >>> http://www.frozenlight.eu > >>> http://www.greatpix.eu > >>> http://www.nathanfoto.com > >>> > >>> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 > >>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > >>> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:22 PM, Frank Dernie wrote: > >>> > >>>> For me the Leica M9 is spot on. They could have made it just for me > >>>> :-) > >>>> I, for one would not trade less resolution for higher iso, though of > >>>> course higher iso would not be a retrograde step... > >>>> Frank > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Leica Users Group. > >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Leica Users Group. > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >> > > > > -- > Sent from my mobile device > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information