Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]And a price reduction of about 1000 euros :-) Douglas Lluis Ripoll Querol wrote: > Nathan, as you say these are mostly importanty for the market that > than for me. > > ISO performence is always welcome but not a really need for me, I > prefer other facilities as: > > - Viewfinder at least 0,72x > - Sensor auto cleaning > - Block the selector, it is too easy to move it > > Saludos, > Lluis > > > El 26/10/2009, a las 18:58, Nathan Wajsman escribi?: > >> I can think of at least the following that would be included in a >> future M10: >> >> - better high ISO performance (whether or not at the cost of reducing >> pixel count must depend on the state of sensor technology in a couple >> of years) >> - a flip-out LCD with Live View >> - video capability >> - geo tagging and other snazzy features found on modern cameras >> - wifi or bluetooth or 3G/4G capability >> >> Not all of these are important to me personally (the first two are), >> but I can imagine that they are for the market. >> >> Nathan >> >> Nathan Wajsman >> Alicante, Spain >> http://www.frozenlight.eu >> http://www.greatpix.eu >> http://www.nathanfoto.com >> >> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 >> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws >> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog >> >> >> >> On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:22 PM, Frank Dernie wrote: >> >>> For me the Leica M9 is spot on. They could have made it just for me :-) >>> I, for one would not trade less resolution for higher iso, though of >>> course higher iso would not be a retrograde step... >>> Frank >>> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >