Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] iso 100.000+??
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:04:31 +0530
References: <380-220091042216311315@M2W004.mail2web.com> <3cad89990910222026m45e74e8ax3c2f0bc9d834386f@mail.gmail.com> <7ac27f4f0910222030r60932b76qb6f8b56c0260fe3c@mail.gmail.com>

No complaint from me either - he is welcome to us what he wants - it
just amuses me to see how other points of view get rubbished, with
incorrect data!
Cheers
Jayanand

On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Richard Man <richard.lists at gmail.com> 
wrote:
> #1 rule on Leica list: never question the superiority of a Leica lens,
> even if it is a Rexx (a dog, get it?)!! :-)
>
> It is also true that whatever Doug is doing or using, he is doing it
> right. So no complaint from me about his choices...
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at 
> gmail.com> wrote:
>> That is only your opinion. I respect it. But I find it is interesting
>> that you comment on lenses other than the one I had mentioned, but
>> that is typical when people would like to justify a point of view a
>> any cost.
>> Cheers
>
>
> --
> // richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
> // w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog:
> http://rfman.wordpress.com
> // book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto at earthlink.net) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)