Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] iso 100.000+??
From: sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter)
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:04:24 -0500
References: <380-2200910422183944463@M2W031.mail2web.com> <59066D3A-56C9-4291-87A6-635D8610A5A1@gmail.com> <a3f189160910221237v533ff2f3x796790ca7fe879d1@mail.gmail.com> <606412.94211.qm@web55905.mail.re3.yahoo.com>

"Photography is a higher form of pointing" - Johnny Deadman


On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 4:01 PM, H. Ball Arche <h_arche at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Gee Sonny, for me the whole Winogrand lesson is that the camera can show
> something that I cannot see.
>
> "I take pictures to see what the world looks like photographed" - G.W.
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr at gmail.com>
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Thu, October 22, 2009 2:37:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] iso 100.000+??
>
> I'm trying to understand the value of a camera that can show something that
> I cannot see.  I might as well start out with an x-ray camera as a 100000
> iso camera.  Same with Infra red, and black and white.
>
> Don't get it. Never will.
>
> The only talent I possess is seeing things  others cannot and then pointing
> them out.
> Sometimes I'm not successful.
>
>
> Shoot Color.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Sonny
> http://www.sonc.com
> http://sonc.stumbleupon.com/
> Natchitoches, Louisiana
> (+31.754164,-093.099080)
>
> USA
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Regards,

Sonny
http://www.sonc.com
http://sonc.stumbleupon.com/
Natchitoches, Louisiana
(+31.754164,-093.099080)

USA


Replies: Reply from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto at earthlink.net) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Message from h_arche at yahoo.com (H. Ball Arche) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)