Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]That isn't, but perhaps images of supermarket shelves have been used to promote the selling unhealthy food to children in those same countries. At 08:11 PM 10/21/2009, you wrote: >Chris Saganich wrote: >>Advertising IS maleficence in action. Editorial is not so much >>better in my book, just promoting the rational. It's easy to >>rationalize "making a living" doing just about anything. Too bad >>that seems to be where the argument ends, that making a living >>justifies ignoring the ethical comportment of the industries we >>work in. I can only wish I could choose which images could be >>stripped naked, exploited, and discarded and which ones could >>not. The very idea of purposely making an image for that destiny >>turns my stomach. Like a rack of ribs to a Buddhist. >I really have no idea what you are talking about. My photos have >been used to raise over $10 million for hunger relief agencies in >the USA and internationally. That's a bad thing?? > >Tina >www.tinamanley.com > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information