Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/07/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Elmarit Collapsible 2.8 vs Summicron 2.0 LTM
From: glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer)
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2009 19:21:55 -0700
References: <daaeb97e0907051624o361bca12m767d38e21bd93496@mail.gmail.com> <200907060043.n660hjVl028201@humboldt.sonic.net>

Gary,

The more recent 2.8 Elmar-M, which I used for years in Japan and 
England, was sharper
than my older DR Summicron.  Lighter too!

Jerry


Gary Todoroff wrote:
> I still have my old f2.8 Elmar, mostly for nostalgia - see how I 
> traded for it in the 60's at:
> http://northcoastphotos.com/article1.html
> It always seemed a bit too soft compared to my other Leica M lenses.
> I much prefer my Summicron Dual Range - extremely sharp even wide 
> open, though I don't know how it compares to the collapsible 
> screw-mount version.
> Gary Todoroff
>
> At 04:24 PM 7/5/2009, you wrote:
>> I have a chance to purchase a IIIg with either the Elmarit 2.8
>> Collapsible or Summicron 2.0 Collapsible lens. Anyone familiar with
>> their characteristics? I'm torn between the two. Any advice would be
>> appreciated.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jim
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>



In reply to: Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] Elmarit Collapsible 2.8 vs Summicron 2.0 LTM)
Message from datamaster at northcoastphotos.com (Gary Todoroff) ([Leica] Elmarit Collapsible 2.8 vs Summicron 2.0 LTM)