Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/07/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Elmarit Collapsible 2.8 vs. Summicron 2.0 LTM
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 01:36:47 -0400
 
The Summicron 2.0 believe it or not has a bad rep.
If it was me I'd go with the Elmar.
Even though it's a much earlier lens probably.
You just might get better results.


Mark William Rabiner



> From: James Laird <digiratidoc at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 18:24:19 -0500
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: [Leica] Elmarit Collapsible 2.8 vs Summicron 2.0 LTM
> 
> I have a chance to purchase a IIIg with either the Elmarit 2.8
> Collapsible or Summicron 2.0 Collapsible lens. Anyone familiar with
> their characteristics? I'm torn between the two. Any advice would be
> appreciated.
> 
> Regards,
> Jim
In reply to: Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] Elmarit Collapsible 2.8 vs Summicron 2.0 LTM)