Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/06/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Henning, I completely agree with all your points. I bought a G1 and 4/3 adaptor a while ago, then got the M adaptor for it, I already had R and OM adaptors for 4/3 system. It was a foolish purchase really, I have only played with it and the best features are all, obviously, with long lenses like the Noctilux from the M and 100 macro, and 180 from the R. I haven't even tried the 12mm on it, but i will some time. F1 may cease to exist as we know it this week. Max Mosely seems determined to hold the entire debate by press release. FOTA had wanted to do everything confidentially to avoid the more controversial secrets coming out, if I am correctly informed. Toyota have had a massive budget cut so, being self-employed rather than an employee in Germany, my involvment was reduced enormously in April, it is difficult to keep my influence up 2 days per month! All the best, Frank On 16 Jun, 2009, at 18:19, Henning Wulff wrote: > Hi Frank, > > I've looked at the Panasonic a bit, as Tom A. has one, and I've seen > Howard's of course as well with other adaptations. The whold package > is interesting, but the fact that the quality subsides as you go to > shorter focal lengths like the 12 and 15 CV and the current lack of > fast and easy to use lenses in the 15 to 20mm range has held me > back. I was hoping the Olympus would try to emulate a Pen F body, > without 'prism' bump. but have a viewfinder in a sleek package. > > The package has turned out sleek, but only due to leaving important > items out. > > As for the lenses, if the two companies don't get their act together > and provide true compatibility across brands and 'standard' and > 'micro' 4/3, then I think the whole exercise will become only a > historical footnote. > > I thought the Olympus would be more appealing than the Panasonic, > but that hope has faded. Now I'm more interested in the Panasonic, > but more lenses are needed. I would _REALLY_ like is a small, > compact larger sensor camera that can take fast interchangeable > lenses. > > Hey! I got one! The M8. > > Actually, an EVF camera with autofocus that can take interchangeable > fast lenses, whether 4/3 or APSC is what I was hoping for from O & > P. Both missed slightly so far, but maybe they will home in > correctly if their present offerings don't lose too much money. > > Meanwhile, I will bait my breath with pickled herring, and not hold > it. > > ...and watch the F1 zoo. The politics have become more interesting > than the racing. > > Regards, Henning > > > At 5:45 PM +0100 6/16/09, Frank Dernie wrote: >> Hi Henning, >> in principle all 4/3 system accessories are supposed to compatible. >> OTOH most 4/3 lenses to not autofocus on the Panasonic G1 using the >> Panasonic adapter. It is implied that the Olympus lenses do so on >> the EP-1 using the Olympus adapter. I wonder if it is the adapter? >> It seemed that only a limited number of lenses were updated for >> contrast detect AF, which is presumably used for all non reflex >> cameras. I wait with baited breath... >> all the best, >> Frank >> >> On 16 Jun, 2009, at 16:49, Henning Wulff wrote: >> >>> Something I would really like to know... >>> >>> Are the Panasonic and Olympus micro 4/3 lenses interchangeable >>> with full functionality? >>> >>> Putting that Oly 17mm lens on the Panasonic might be interesting, >>> or the (sometime soon) 20mm/1.7 Panasonic on the Olympus. >>> >>> All in all, I'm rather disappointed in the Olympus body, though. >>> Without a viewfinder it is severely crippled, in my opinion. >>> -- > > > -- > > * Henning J. Wulff > /|\ Wulff Photography & Design > /###\ mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com > |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information