Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I agree. On Jun 1, 2009, at 11:36 AM, George Lottermoser wrote: > and i would theorize > that the more AA applied > the more sharpening needed > the less "real" fine detail > and the more "invented" fine detail. > > therefore > less 3 dimensionality > less illusion of surface and substance > more digital (digitized) appearance. > > i understand the subjective nature of what i'm saying > i'm do not intend to "argue" the point. > > simply discussing a quest for a "look" and "feel" in the prints > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > george at imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > On May 31, 2009, at 9:37 PM, Thein Onn Ming wrote: > >> But it is a good illustration of how much inherently sharper a non- >> AA camera (the M8) is than the best of the AA cameras (arguably, >> the D3) straight out of the box with sharpening set to zero in ACR >> defaults. > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information THEIN Onn Ming *photohorologer ming at www.mingthein.com www.flickr.com/mingthein