Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]That is what I have to do to get the same amount of perceived sharpness (at least to my eyes). It doesn't matter at all for the final print. But it is a good illustration of how much inherently sharper a non-AA camera (the M8) is than the best of the AA cameras (arguably, the D3) straight out of the box with sharpening set to zero in ACR defaults. On Jun 1, 2009, at 10:30 AM, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote: > Ming, > Why should that make a difference, or matter at all? After all all of > us have our own preferences on how sharp a print should look. Are both > prints good, and artifact free at the end of the process? That is all > that should matter! > Cheers > Jayanand > > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Thein Onn Ming > <mingthein at gmail.com> wrote: >> I still sharpen the M8, but not very much - typically something like >> 100/0.3/0 using PS CS3 smart sharpen, as opposed to 200/0.4/0 and >> then >> another pass of 100/0.2/0 with the D3's output. Quite a big >> difference... >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information THEIN Onn Ming *photohorologer ming at www.mingthein.com www.flickr.com/mingthein