Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: D3x vs. 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples
From: mingthein at gmail.com (Thein Onn Ming)
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 10:10:23 +0800
References: <200905301516.BPV96835@rg4.comporium.net> <C6472CE9.4F398%mark@rabinergroup.com> <200905311557.BQZ30558@rg5.comporium.net>

If you sharpen gently, how would they know? It could be the raw  
converter. Seems odd.

On May 31, 2009, at 11:57 PM, Tina Manley wrote:

> At 06:35 PM 5/30/2009, you wrote:
>> Software sharpening is simply NOT AN OPTIONAL PART of the traditional
>> digital workflow. You don't go "gee I sharpened this one!"
>> You leave it out you just don't have a picture.
>> It cuts all the phlegm away showing what's underneath.
>>
>> Mark William Rabiner
>
> Except that most stock agencies allow absolutely no sharpening of  
> any kind.  There is no telling what the final usage of the photo  
> will be so any sharpening is supposed to be left up to the buyer.   
> I had many Canon files rejected for being "soft and lacking  
> detail".  I've never had an M8 file rejected for any reason.
>
> Tina
>
> Tina Manley
> www.tinamanley.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

THEIN Onn Ming
*photohorologer ming at www.mingthein.com
www.flickr.com/mingthein







Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs. 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)
In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs. 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs. 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)