Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/05/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 11:16:44 -0400
References: <DC4B73A4105FCE4FAE0CEF799BF84B36052E95C3@case-email.casefoods.com> <5DE18596-6665-4ADB-9C48-F0724B92B1BE@gmail.com> <A2EC9463-384C-43EC-A963-BB18E0AC3559@usjet.net> <BF1F30E3-821C-44CD-97E0-ED5FCFBB4D82@mac.com>
At 12:42 AM 5/30/2009, you wrote:
>May be of some interest
>in this discussion
>< http://www.maxmax.com/nikon_d200hr.htm>
>
>Regards,
>George Lottermoser
Ah hah! Very enlightening. I don't understand why lack of moire is
more important than detail to the manufacturers who included the AA filter.
Tina
Tina Manley
www.tinamanley.com
Replies:
Reply from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs. 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)
In reply to:
Message from drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)
Message from mingthein at gmail.com (Ming Thein) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)