Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] HIGHLY TECHNICAL QUESTION?
From: mingthein at gmail.com (Thein Onn Ming)
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 21:20:56 +0800
References: <200905202031.BQM08525@rg5.comporium.net> <20090521013018.IBUH8364.eastrmmtao105.cox.net@eastrmimpo03.cox.net> <200905210135.BQM37975@rg5.comporium.net> <d02ca8d32845c.4a146b3c@shaw.ca> <7ac27f4f0905201857u6c2846edtca2c4adc23ef77d0@mail.gmail.com> <1A3DF126-167F-46D0-8BF7-C43C6BFEE4A9@bex.net> <BLU0-SMTP84098B6875D77896B1C2958C590@phx.gbl>

The electrons liberated from  the battery into the sensor (simplified  
version) are probably just dissipated as heat through the electrical  
components. Otherwise, you wouldn't need to worry about charging a  
battery or amp noise...

By the way, I'm new here. :)

Cheers
Ming

On May 21, 2009, at 8:49 PM, Vick Ko wrote:

> Yes, these two answers, by Howard and Richard, are the two most  
> "realistic".
>
> First, there is the mechanistic answer, that the pixels are merely  
> the electro-magnetic storage states of the storage medium, and  
> deletion alters their state.  This alteration requires energy  
> input, and you get into the operation and physics of the particular  
> storage media.  And that alteration might only be the elimination  
> of the file definition (header) bytes, or might be the entire  
> overwriting of the whole pixel array to a "start state".
>
> Then, there is the "information philosophy" side, which Howard  
> talks about.  Where did the information represented by that "state  
> of the set of pixels, which might be an image", go?  Is is now  
> distributed into the minds and memories of all those who saw it?  I  
> personally don't understand the hypothesis that "information is  
> never destroyed", but that is an indication of my lack of  
> understanding.
>
>
> ...Vick
>
> Howard Ritter wrote:
>> Congratulations, Dr Ted! That is actually a very subtle and  
>> incisive question.
>> The answer is rooted in quantum mechanics, information theory, and  
>> the notion
>> that information, like matter and energy, is never destroyed.  
>> There was a prolonged
>> and passionate debate in the physics community on this question.  
>> It was feared
>> initially that when matter falls into a black hole, its  
>> information content is lost, to
>> the great consternation of many physicists. It seemed as egregious  
>> a violation of
>> fundamental physics as a violation of the conservation of energy.  
>> But clever
>> insights and analysis finally saved the day. Check out The Black  
>> Hole War by
>> Leonard Susskind, or at least James Trefil's Washington Post  
>> review of the book at
>> Amazon:
>>
>> http://www.amazon.com/Black-Hole-War-Stephen-Mechanics/dp/ 
>> 0316016411/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1242872534&sr=8-1
>>
>> So wherever the pixels go, in some fashion their information is  
>> never lost to the
>> universe?no matter how good your memory scrubber is! The question  
>> is, where
>> do the pixels go?oh, but that's what you asked, isn't it?
>>
>> That's my circular explanation.
>>
>> ?howard
>>
>> On May 20, 2009, at 9:57 PM, Richard Man wrote:
>>
>>> It goes to the bit bucket in the heaven!
>>>
>>> The pixels are stored as a file in the media, so it goes wherever  
>>> files go
>>> when you delete a file. In practical terms, under Windows,  
>>> normally the
>>> files go to the Recycling Bin so you can rescue them if needed  
>>> unless you
>>> empty the Recycling Bin. When that happens, the disk space used  
>>> by the file
>>> may be used by the system for the other files, but at the system  
>>> level, the
>>> file is stored in multiple locations and it's possible to recover  
>>> portion of
>>> the file even if the system reclaims and file and uses the  
>>> storage space.
>>>
>>> There are methods to more permanently delete a file involving  
>>> actively
>>> modifying all the data that the file. In the extreme case, one  
>>> could destroy
>>> the drive by removing the platters and pound it into bits...
>>>
>>> Does this help?
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 6:42 PM, TED GRANT <tedgrant at shaw.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have just been asked a technical question and require an exact  
>>>> answer if
>>>> possible.
>>>> "WHERE DO THE PIXELS GO WHEN YOU DELETE A PICTURE?"
>>>> Dr. ted
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

THEIN Onn Ming
*photohorologer ming at www.mingthein.com
www.flickr.com/mingthein







Replies: Reply from eric.calderwood at btinternet.com (Eric Calderwood) ([Leica] HIGHLY TECHNICAL QUESTION?)
Reply from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] HIGHLY TECHNICAL QUESTION?)
In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Cameras Banned)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Cameras Banned)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Cameras Banned)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (TED GRANT) ([Leica] HIGHLY TECHNICAL QUESTION?)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] HIGHLY TECHNICAL QUESTION?)
Message from hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter) ([Leica] HIGHLY TECHNICAL QUESTION?)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] HIGHLY TECHNICAL QUESTION?)