Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'd trade my first born puppy for a 21 JSK SA true symmetric wide-angle gorgeous compact chunk of glass. A reason to own a Leica M body if ever there was one. The 3.4 of course not that first out f4 which his nothing to write home to MOM about. A signature lens for many a photog. That one guy who shot all the nudes of the gals in black and white Jean-Loupe Sieff! And works great on an m8 despite early warnings. I've seen the projected slides. Mark William Rabiner > From: Slobodan Dimitrov <s.dimitrov at charter.net> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 09:12:25 -0700 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] 4 best and worst M lenses > > The worst are the 21mm S/A, the Tele-Elmarit 90mm, the 50mm Summarit, > and the last lens you spent too much money for just to shoot flowers. > S.d. > > > On May 10, 2009, at 9:03 AM, Douglas Nygren wrote: > >> What in your opinion are the best four M lenses and why? What are >> the four worst? >> >> I thought it would be interesting to read how the luggers would >> answer these questions. >> >> I realize that best and worst are subjective. Subjective answers >> are welcome as are so-called objective replies. Un-welcome is the >> rhetoric that all the M book writers employ. >> >> Which are the lenses to die for, which should check into the dog >> pound, and why, of course? >> >> Have fun--Doug >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information