Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/03/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Hartblei tilt shift rotation lenses get Zeiss name
From: tgray at 125px.com (Tim Gray)
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:17:29 -0400
References: <C5F76931.4C1AD%mark@rabinergroup.com> <190490.8788.qm@web82105.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <07B64F98-6E3F-422F-AB18-0DADCAB41713@ralgo.nl> <429205.40598.qm@web82108.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <8f5413a60903310924r1e4dfae3p4a910e506ba2c0@mail.gmail.com> <780109.16267.qm@web82102.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

I guess I kind of assumed that this company was merely repackaging
existing MF lens designs that were NOT meant for movements on MF into
35mm tilt/shift lenses.  But maybe that was a poor assumption.

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Bob Adler <rgacpa at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Tim,
> Yes that is true. However?Canon and Nikon do make TS lenses for 35mm.?It's 
> probably?completely unnoticable in such fine glass as Zeiss, but I do 
> believe the lines per inch is significantly less in a 6x6 design vs a 35mm 
> lens design. I do think there is a bit of a need to move more glass by 
> this company and adoption to these bodies is to some degree?(probably 
> large, IMO)?driven by that. No problem; like I said, probably unnoticable. 
> I'd like to have the 40 to compare!!
> Now back to?taking?photos...
> Best,
> Bob
> ?Bob Adler
> Palo Alto, CA
> http://www.raflexions.com
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Tim Gray <tgray at 125px.com>
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:24:55 AM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Hartblei tilt shift rotation lenses get Zeiss name
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Bob Adler <rgacpa at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Thanks Bruce. I actually got this from the DPReview website that states 
>> the lenses were designed for 6x6 format. My understanding is that the 
>> resolution of lenses designed for 6x6 format is different than those 
>> designed for 35mm format. So I was just wondering why one would want to 
>> make a 6x6 lense fitting?only/mostly 35mm camera manufacturers.
>
> I kind of assumed that since MF lenses have a bigger imaging circle,
> it's easier to make a tilt shift lens out of them for 35mm.? The image
> has to cover 6x6cm, so you can shift 1.25cm (estimate) in any
> direction and still cover 35mm.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Hartblei tilt shift rotation lenses get Zeiss name)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Hartblei tilt shift rotation lenses get Zeiss name)
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] Hartblei tilt shift rotation lenses get Zeiss name)
Message from leica at ralgo.nl (leica) ([Leica] Hartblei tilt shift rotation lenses get Zeiss name)
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] Hartblei tilt shift rotation lenses get Zeiss name)
Message from tgray at 125px.com (Tim Gray) ([Leica] Hartblei tilt shift rotation lenses get Zeiss name)
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] Hartblei tilt shift rotation lenses get Zeiss name)