Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/02/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Is the DOF using a digital sensor any different than that of film?
From: len-001 at verizon.net (Leonard Taupier)
Date: Sat Feb 7 06:38:46 2009
References: <BLU0-SMTP504288C23B0AA68D8D767D8CC00@phx.gbl>

Here are two interesting discussions on the subject.


<http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/digital-forum/5541-m8- 
dof.html#post52697>

<http://photo.net/learn/optics/dofdigital/>

Len





On Feb 5, 2009, at 5:26 PM, Vick Ko wrote:

> Is the DOF using a digital sensor (e.g M8, Pana G1) any different  
> than that of film?
>
> In a question on Rangefinder forum, I was asking about using the  
> Pana G1 as the most economical way to play "digital M", and got  
> into a discussion on "loss of DOF" with digital sensors.
>
> I never understood that. With a crop sensor, isn't it just like  
> shooting with a third of the 36 x 24mm frame covered?
>
> The razor thin DOF of my Noctilux is still razor thin, just that  
> the image that I'm taking is like cropping it to that of a 100mm  
> lens. Or, to think of it another way, my Noctilux becomes a 100mm  
> f1 portrait lens, a focal length that once was considered close to  
> perfect for portraits.
>
> And fortunately, with the Panasonic, I see what I'm framing.
>
> Isn't that so, about the DOF?
>
> regards
> Vick
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Is the DOF using a digital sensor any different than that of film?)