Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] can lousy photography provide a powerful document? WAS? Ted -OOPS!
From: philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD)
Date: Tue Jan 20 04:25:38 2009
References: <C59ADF49.48AE5%mark@rabinergroup.com>

Forgot the link to Douglas's trove first time, sorry
http://www.sutcliffephotographs.com/ph894f28htm.htm
Phx


>>
>>Ted Grant wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>But that's life! Bottom line?.. We get paid and sometimes that's all that
>>>matters.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>ted
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Hi Ted,
>>with all due respect, some people have long had a different approach,
>>even though yours is down to earth and also founded.
>>Douglas Sharp posted this link a while ago and I think it puts things
>>into another perspective (thanks again Douglas).
>>
>>Now, as to the initial question i.e. lousy photo vs powerful document,
>>my answer in that precise instance is yes.
>>Mood and picture quality match quite well, and the series associated ith
>>the comments convey a deep sense of 'mute' despair.
>>My reading of it all, of course.
>>
>>Amiti?s
>>Philippe
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Leica Users Group.
>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>  
>

Replies: Reply from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] can lousy photography provide a powerful document? WAS? Ted -OOPS!)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] can lousy photography provide a powerful document? WAS? Ted)