Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/01/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Dehumanizing portraits?
From: sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter)
Date: Mon Jan 19 13:48:52 2009
References: <5B13112AD743CA6EF73CB6B2@hindolveston.reid.org> <49748995.1070108@summaventures.com> <F56E4221-F88E-429B-AEC0-A95231307675@cox.net> <C5E919E3-BE92-4ACE-8F7A-8BE816F43907@mac.com> <BA1D5252-950F-4D96-8A96-C31FAC9F2893@cox.net> <C2880B5A-68AB-4B76-960A-5D7966EEEADA@mac.com> <5CB1F9AE-EE9A-4895-9FE8-8D87E57A185B@cox.net>
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Steve Barbour <kididdoc@cox.net> wrote:
> yet when Axelrod posed with cookies, the photographers chose not to show
> that image, as "it almost didn't look real" "it was too silly"...
Having seen several interviews with Axelrod, I think the one they chose
really captures his character. You can see one of the cookie poses in the
backstory, and if I didn't know what he had in his hand, I'd certainly think
it was something else. Emanuel is also a great capture of the guy; you can
almost his short fuse getting ready to go off. I also loved the Gates
shot, (having come from a military family.) Nichols and Cole were really
neat.
Regards,
Sonny
http://www.sonc.com
http://sonc.stumbleupon.com/
Natchitoches, Louisiana
USA
In reply to:
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] Dehumanizing portraits?)
Message from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] Dehumanizing portraits?)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Dehumanizing portraits?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Dehumanizing portraits?)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Dehumanizing portraits?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Dehumanizing portraits?)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Dehumanizing portraits?)