Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/11/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I see no cardboard effect, rather wonderful photographs. Wish I had them in print for sure. Beautiful subjects, angles, lights and tones Small ? yes! But large enough to pick out what makes them work. Whatever the gear. Phx Bob W wrote: >Not sure what your point is. I can't very well circulate his negatives to >the list. The web is the best we're going to get in a hurry to show pictures >by anyone, whatever they use. I have all of his books, and I've seen some of >his prints - I guess you'll have to take my word for it. > >Bob > > > >>I think when you're looking at a jpeg which is 335x515 pixels >>which his is I >>checked and is a 35KB file it could have been shot with a >>cardboard throw >>away and you'd never know the difference. Certainly not >>sizable enough to >>tell the difference between different coating methods on >>lenses. These are >>slightly big thumbnails. You know what the shot is of. That's >>about it. >> >> >> > > > >>>James Ravilious deliberately used older (pre-war) Leica >>> >>> >>lenses for his >> >> >>>photos of North Devon - a very effective technique for his >>> >>> >>subject matter. >> >> >>>http://www.jamesravilious.com/ >>> >>>Bob >>> >>> > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > >