Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/11/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Not sure what your point is. I can't very well circulate his negatives to the list. The web is the best we're going to get in a hurry to show pictures by anyone, whatever they use. I have all of his books, and I've seen some of his prints - I guess you'll have to take my word for it. Bob > > I think when you're looking at a jpeg which is 335x515 pixels > which his is I > checked and is a 35KB file it could have been shot with a > cardboard throw > away and you'd never know the difference. Certainly not > sizable enough to > tell the difference between different coating methods on > lenses. These are > slightly big thumbnails. You know what the shot is of. That's > about it. > > > > > James Ravilious deliberately used older (pre-war) Leica > lenses for his > > photos of North Devon - a very effective technique for his > subject matter. > > > > http://www.jamesravilious.com/ > > > > Bob