[Leica] glossy screen iMac problems

[dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings)]

Yeah, I've been a little sceptical about how much they charge for
360gb instead of 250gb disk and extra gigabytes of internal memory.
Their extra charges seem to be extremely inflated.

I guess I'll take a look at the 24" screen. I know where I can look at
the two sizes side by side.

Daniel


On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Steve Unsworth
<lug@steveunsworth.co.uk> wrote:
> The screen on the 24" is supposed to be better than the smaller screens.
>
> Don't buy the extra memory from Apple, their prices are very high. I bought
> from a 3rd party in the UK. Even though I had to ditch the 2 gig that the
> iMac came with it still worked out cheaper than buying the machine with 4
> gig from Apple.
>
> Steve
>
>
> On 18/10/08 20:29, "Daniel Ridings" <dlridings@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I looked at a 20" iMac today (they didn't have a 24" on display).
>>
>> Thanks. You do a lot of b/w too. I'm waiting to see what Arche finally
>> pins down.
>>
>> The 20" iMac was very reasonable, pricewise. It would need more
>> internal memory, but that's not an arm and a leg.
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Steve Unsworth
>> <lug@steveunsworth.co.uk> wrote:
>>> The window's Vuescan serial number will work ok with the iMac, and I use 
>>> it
>>> with a Nikon Coolscan V. I swapped to a 24" iMac a few months ago, wish 
>>> I'd
>>> done it earlier.
>>>
>>> Steve
>>>
>>>
>>> On 17/10/08 18:14, "Daniel Ridings" <dlridings@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Since Lightroom came with both a Mac and a PC version, it's fairly
>>>> undramatic to make the change. I'll have to check out Vuescan first,
>>>> but I can't image there should be any problems. At one time the Nikon
>>>> Coolscans were giving headaches, but I think we're talking about years
>>>> ago.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>