Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/10/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]A point and shoot camera should be used with minimum manipulation. If one needs to do an overt amount of post production manipulation, then one didn't bring 'enough' camera to a shoot. Tonight I did some podium shooting with the G10. Definitely won't try that again. If I ever get a Canon STE2 Speedlite Transmitter, I might try it again. But even then maybe not, it's just not that fast for it. It did well enough with shots of a conference and some phone banking. But I'm going to have to be very careful not to over use it and stick with the bigger sensors. s.d. On Oct 18, 2008, at 11:02 AM, Philippe AMARD wrote: > I loved yours Victor, as previously said, whatever the gear, and/or > PS work behind the scenes > They DO work for me - as photographs? as works of art? I don't know > or mind, but they appeal much, that's what matters, for me at least. > > Slobodan's are in another category - most respectful too, and more > telling of what the camera can do. So maybe more "on topic". > Bien amicalement to both of you. > phx > > > Victor Rubin wrote: > >> Hi Luis- there is no question but Slobodan's images are first >> class- My >> images go through massive post-processing in PS therefore look far >> more >> manipulated than do the natural look of Slobodan's work. >> Slobodan's images >> are far more telling as to what the G10 can do straight, without >> manipulation. I admire his work (and your's Luis) immensely. I, >> however, >> will always work through PS- it's best for me. Saludos Cordiales- >> vroger >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information