Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/09/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: camera shake was: Re: [Leica] a serious question
From: vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko)
Date: Fri Sep 26 06:12:29 2008

Not a problem with the M8 fitted with a Visoflex.

And the increased mass will help with inertial stabilization.

:-)

Vick


>From: FRANK DERNIE <frank.dernie@btinternet.com>
>Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>Subject: Re: camera shake was: Re: [Leica] a serious question
>Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:10:11 +0000 (GMT)
>
>I would imagine the biggest problem shooting wildlife on an M8 would be 
>focussing the 500mm f4 lens..........
>
>
>--- On Fri, 26/9/08, Kyle Cassidy <kcassidy@asc.upenn.edu> wrote:
>
> > From: Kyle Cassidy <kcassidy@asc.upenn.edu>
> > Subject: camera shake was: Re: [Leica] a serious question
> > To: lug@leica-users.org
> > Date: Friday, 26 September, 2008, 2:05 PM
> > Tina posited her M8 works better than her 5d, Jayanand
> > mused:
> >
> > > The Canon SLRs will exhibit more shake than the M8
> > >will. I shoot a lot of wildlife, and for that the M8 is
> > useless.
> >
> > I ask -- Is this still true in the days of VR lenses? Does
> > the M8 let you shoot at a lower shutter speed than a Canikon
> > with an image stabilization lens?
> >
> > I dunno, I'm asking. I haven't seen any tests.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
> > information
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE) (camera shake was: Re: [Leica] a serious question)