Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/08/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Its history is that of judicial nationalism, even at its most self- restrained excretions. See the start of it all at McCulloch v. Maryland (1819). S. On Aug 20, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote: > So once again, this extreme right wing Supreme Court has come down > on the side of business vs. consumers. Why am I not surprised? > > Nathan Wajsman > Alicante, Spain > http://www.frozenlight.eu > http://www.greatpix.eu > http://www.nathanfoto.com > > Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog > > > > On Aug 20, 2008, at 6:54 PM, Marc James Small wrote: > >> >> The US Supreme Court in a poorly reported Opinion not yet posted >> to their Web Site seems to have ruled in the past several days >> that such Fair Trade Laws are Constitutionally impermissible as >> breaching the validity of contract between manufacturer and >> dealer. I suspect that, once I read the Opinion, I will agree >> with it philosophically but I certainly am glad that the Warren >> Court didn't rule that way on the initial challenge in 1955 as >> then my book would have been half its length .... >> >> Marc >> >> >> msmall@aya.yale.edu >> Cha robh b?s fir gun ghr?s fir! >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information