[Leica] Is Lightroom 2.0 Really Shipping?

[philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD)]

Daniel Ridings wrote:

>On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 11:04 PM, Philippe AMARD
><philippe.amard@tele2.fr> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>you don't need that with LR, it does it for you
>>follow Nathan's method, but just use a large enough HD, no trees and roots
>>or inherited reflexes from MS DOS, and everything will be fine for a 
>>loooong
>>time
>>    
>>
>
>That's part of the problem. Since I don't usually edit my images using
>Lightroom, but Photoshop, I like to be able to find them according to
>my system.
>
>  
>
OK then - I wish you the best with your filing system and photoshop. 
Sorry to have been intrusive.
Bien cordialement
Phx

>Lightroom has never given me the impression that you can trust it in
>the way you recommend. I think it also goes down to the "day" when it
>comes to images and it probably wouldn't work for me anyway since I
>put in a lot of scans that don't have the embedded info LR probably
>uses to confuse the user.
>
>Daniel
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>  
>