Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/08/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 01:46 AM 8/17/2008, you wrote: >As for LR2 being a totally different program than LR 1.4, I do not >agree with Tina. I installed it at the end of July, in about 10 >minutes my catalogue with 7500 images was converted, and the look and >feel is pretty much the same, with some subtle changes, mostly for the >better. >Nathan > >Nathan Wajsman Nathan - My point was that if you only tried LR 1.4 and were judging the program by that, you might find 2.0 to be a totally different experience. So much is improved. It is much faster, there are many more very handy tools, the Auto setting are vastly improved. The way that catalogs and folders are handled in 2.0 and the fact that LR now identifies where the original files are stored made it possible for me to use LR as a database to replace iView. I used the beta version of 2.0 since it came out, but the actual 2.0 is much, much better. I think Wade and his team did a fantastic job. I can't think of many ways I'd improve LR 2.0, but I'm sure just as PhotoShop has improved since the first version, LR will continue to be improved. Tina Tina Manley www.tinamanley.com