Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/06/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It was the 180/3.4 apo telyt. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Seth Rosner" <sethrosner@nycap.rr.com> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 9:13 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Favorite Non-Leica-Leica Lens? > Emanuel, I'm pretty sure it was the 180/2,8, the first iteration and very > heavy, even without the goggles; it is possible that Leitz also tried it > with the Apo f/3,4 but I don't think so. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "EPL" <manolito@videotron.ca> > To: <lug@leica-users.org> > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:49 PM > Subject: [Leica] Re: Favorite Non-Leica-Leica Lens? > > >>I once saw a factory prototype 180 mm lens with goggles on it, for the M >> camera. Something like a larger version of the 135/2.8, but cannot >> remember >> if it was the 180/3.4 or the Elmar f:4. Not a terrible idea, but probably >> past its market viability at this point. >> >> Emanuel >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >