Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/06/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Favorite Non-Leica-Leica Lens?
From: sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner)
Date: Thu Jun 12 06:14:14 2008
References: <C4760700.2732%manolito@videotron.ca>

Emanuel, I'm pretty sure it was the 180/2,8, the first iteration and very 
heavy, even without the goggles; it is possible that Leitz also tried it 
with the Apo f/3,4 but I don't think so.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "EPL" <manolito@videotron.ca>
To: <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:49 PM
Subject: [Leica] Re: Favorite Non-Leica-Leica Lens?


>I once saw a factory prototype 180 mm lens with goggles on it, for the M
> camera. Something like a larger version of the 135/2.8, but cannot 
> remember
> if it was the 180/3.4 or the Elmar f:4. Not a terrible idea, but probably
> past its market viability at this point.
>
> Emanuel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from alal at duke.poly.edu (A. Lal) ([Leica] Re: Favorite Non-Leica-Leica Lens?)
In reply to: Message from manolito at videotron.ca (EPL) ([Leica] Re: Favorite Non-Leica-Leica Lens?)