Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/09/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: LUG Digest, Vol 35, Issue 482
From: grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey@mchsi.com)
Date: Fri Sep 21 21:54:06 2007

Very true.  I have about 3 or more engineering change orders every week for 
approval to use a replacement part where the suppliers have changed or 
replaced a part with a new one, which may or may not be an exact fit or 
function replacement.

Gene

-------------- Original message from Stan Yoder <s.yoder@verizon.net>: 
-------------- 


> > If I'm a manufacturer I don't go around telling people I'm having to 
> > botch something together because I don't have the parts - IMO, the silly 
> > buggers could just as well have kept quiet about the new version. 
> > 
> 
> What? And have another bunch of neurotic yahoos bitch about Leica's 
> buggery 
> secretive practices? 
> 
> And anyway, it's not about not having parts, it's about a supplier 
> changing a 
> part, which happens 
> all the time in most product lives. 
> 
> Stan Yoder 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Leica Users Group. 
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 

Replies: Reply from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] Re: LUG Digest, Vol 35, Issue 482)
Reply from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] Re: LUG Digest, Vol 35, Issue 482)