Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/08/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Old lens, new lens
From: alex at zabrovsky.com (Alex)
Date: Sat Aug 11 07:26:15 2007
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20070807223620.00bc36f0@mail.2alpha.com> <46BD6A56.7060501@nathanfoto.com> <036801c7dc10$e81cfdb0$b856f910$@net> <46BDBA15.7080502@zabrovsky.com> <036a01c7dc16$5b2b63f0$11822bd0$@net>
 
Now, that is something I cannot disagree.
Kind of popular joke by embedded programmers about HW engineers with 
whom they used to work together: any bug/problem in a system (board 
level) can be solved by a resistor, if not - then by a capacitor. If 
neither resistor nor capacitor cures the issue - use both and the 
problem will be resolved.. LOL

Alex

Frank Filippone wrote:

>My point was that in the digital age, and especially for the digital
>generation, there IS a fix, digitally, to any problem.  In fact, to that
>generation, it is the "only" fix relevant and anything is possible.
>
>Personally, unless the image is hurtfully sharp, I throw out the negative.
>Leica, Hasselblad, or 4x5.
>
>a) Life is too short to deal with images that are faulted.
>b) I don't "do" digital.
>
>Frank Filippone
>red735i@earthlink.net
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>  
>
Replies: Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Old lens, new lens)
Reply from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] Old lens, new lens)
 In reply to: Message from pklein at 2alpha.net (Peter Klein) ([Leica] Old lens, new lens)
Message from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Old lens, new lens)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Old lens, new lens)
Message from alex at zabrovsky.com (Alex) ([Leica] Old lens, new lens)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Old lens, new lens)