Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/08/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Old lens, new lens
From: luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll)
Date: Sat Aug 11 07:11:44 2007
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20070807223620.00bc36f0@mail.2alpha.com> <46BD6A56.7060501@nathanfoto.com> <036801c7dc10$e81cfdb0$b856f910$@net><46BDBA15.7080502@zabrovsky.com> <036a01c7dc16$5b2b63f0$11822bd0$@net>

Hi Frank,

I'm absoloutely agree with your message, on the other hand I own too the
Summilux 35 pre ASPH, and also the Summicron 35 4th generation, and usually
I use the impefect unsharp ... Summilux.

Saludos cordiales
Luis

 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En nombre de
Frank Filippone
Enviado el: s?bado, 11 de agosto de 2007 14:52
Para: 'Leica Users Group'
Asunto: RE: [Leica] Old lens, new lens

My point was that in the digital age, and especially for the digital
generation, there IS a fix, digitally, to any problem.  In fact, to that
generation, it is the "only" fix relevant and anything is possible.

Personally, unless the image is hurtfully sharp, I throw out the negative.
Leica, Hasselblad, or 4x5.

a) Life is too short to deal with images that are faulted.
b) I don't "do" digital.

Frank Filippone
red735i@earthlink.net





_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from pklein at 2alpha.net (Peter Klein) ([Leica] Old lens, new lens)
Message from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Old lens, new lens)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Old lens, new lens)
Message from alex at zabrovsky.com (Alex) ([Leica] Old lens, new lens)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Old lens, new lens)