Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/08/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Canon vs. Lux
From: hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson)
Date: Wed Aug 8 17:44:11 2007
References: <200708090000.l78NxoXI087986@server1.waverley.reid.org> <75378C5B-E0D3-4FE8-A388-FCBF489762C6@optonline.net>

I though that fifty years was pretty clever and descriptive, actually

Cheers
Hoppy

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org 
[mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Lawrence Zeitlin
Sent: Thursday, 9 August 2007 10:07
To: lug@leica-users.org
Subject: [Leica] Re: Canon vs. Lux


On Aug 8, 2007, at 8:00 PM, lug-request@leica-users.org wrote:

> If your model has the same attitude toward
> pictures of herself as my wife, she would insist that you trash the
> Lux, or at least never use it within 50 years of her.


Sorry, I meant to say "never use it within 50 YARDS of her."  
Unfortunately the spell checker corrects only misspelled words - not  
misused words.

Larry Z

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Re: Canon vs. Lux)